Common law

COMMON LAW V. STATUTORY JURISDICTION WHICH ARE YOU IN? Part 7

FEDERAL JURISDICTION Article I, Section 8 of both federal Constitutions state:

“Congress shall have power to exercise exclusive legislation, in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States; and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings.”

Cession; the formal giving up of rights, property, or territory by a state.. No state has Cessioned any land to the Federal Government. The Federal Government is renting the state’s land for military bases and other needful buildings.

Notice it does not say the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT has authority over any of the 50 several states of the protective Union of nations of North America Republic land area.

Your rights to own property and to engage in voluntary exchange by NON-REGISTRATION of your business or property are basic common law rights.
Common-Law is the law of the land, the law of the Constitution.
Statutory law is legislated law as codes, statutes, rules, regulations, opinions, Presumptions, Assumptions, and public policy under the Color of Law and written by BAR and BANK ATTORNEYS for their own gain. For their own gain includes the BANK and GOVERNMENT corporations that they work for. Your rights to own property and to engage in voluntary exchange by NON-REGISTRATION of your business or property are basic common law rights. Think about it..

Content Protection by DMCA.com

4 thoughts on “COMMON LAW V. STATUTORY JURISDICTION WHICH ARE YOU IN? Part 7”

  1. When the CAP security pays off a debt
    with a bank does the UCC-3 filing result in the bank receive the same financial benefit, via the government payment, as it would if the bank received payment from a regular payoff check or does the debt just go to zero and any, for example, prepayment penalty for the bank, just disappear.
    Curious as to whether there might be anyway to take away any bank resistance
    to accepting the CAP security.
    Is it possible to set up a loan with a bank that would install a prepayment penalty
    that would help to insure the cooperation of the bank and not having to go to court?

  2. When the CAP security pays off a debt
    to a bank does the UCC-3 filing result in the bank receive the same financial benefit, via the government paying off the debt, as it would if the bank received a check from the man/woman/business that has the debt?

  3. Hello David:
    I was in hopes that my above question (of August 12) would be replied to, by you, by now. Would very much appreciate receiving your feedback.
    Thank you..

    1. I think I did reply to BOTH of the same question with one being more explicit..

      Yes the bank gets paid under the obligations of the account of the United States and Yes, your debt has been paid or discharged with the CAP Financial Security Instrument. Yes, the CAP is security used as money the same as the MORTGAGE, OR fEDERAL rESERVE pROMISSORY nOTE dOLLOR, OR T A bANK cHECK, OR A mONEY oRDER, BECAUSE THEY ALL ARE DEBT INSTRUMENTS, CONTRACTS, AND AGREEMENTS..

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our News Letter Below

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner